The FOX Business Taylor Riggs joined FBN in December 2022 and debuted as co-host of "The Big Money Show" (weekdays 12–2 PM ET) on January 23, 2023. Before that, she spent nine years at Bloomberg News, co-anchored a daily Bloomberg TV program covering bonds, equities, currencies, and commodities, and reported on municipal bonds for The Bond Buyer. She holds a CFA charter and is a Juris Doctor candidate at New York Law School. Her Muck Rack profile lists her under the handle "riggsreport" and ties directly to her Fox Business work. As recently as March 9, 2026, she appeared as co-host on a Fox Business clip, so she's actively in that role today. If you've stumbled onto results about a golf coach or an actress, you can safely set those aside.
The short answer: what is Taylor Riggs' net worth?

The honest estimate for Taylor Riggs' net worth as of 2026 sits in the range of $1 million to $3 million, with a midpoint estimate around $2 million being the most commonly cited figure across net-worth tracking sites. That range reflects a combination of her television anchor salary across nearly a decade at Bloomberg plus her ongoing Fox Business contract, speaking fees, and the kind of steady professional income that accumulates when someone builds a serious career in financial media. It is not a confirmed, audited figure. Taylor Riggs has not made any public financial disclosures, and no court filings, property records, or verified asset statements underpin these numbers. Think of this as a well-reasoned range, not a certified ledger balance.
Where the money actually comes from
Television anchor salary
This is the biggest driver of her accumulated wealth. Taylor Riggs spent nine years at Bloomberg Television, a major financial news network where experienced anchors typically earn between $100,000 and $300,000 annually depending on seniority and show placement. Her co-anchor role on a daily multi-hour program (2–5 PM ET) puts her toward the upper end of that range for later-stage Bloomberg tenure. At Fox Business Network, the salary environment for named co-hosts of weekday shows is broadly similar, with estimates from net-worth tracking sites placing her current annual salary somewhere between $120,000 and $250,000. Over a roughly 13-year media career through 2026, even conservative salary assumptions produce cumulative pre-tax earnings well above $1 million.
Public speaking fees

Talent and speakers bureaus are a meaningful secondary income stream for financial journalists with her profile. Gotham Artists lists Taylor Riggs' speaking fee range at $20,000 to $30,000 per engagement, and she is also represented through Speakers Associates and listed in TheSpeakerHandbook. If she books even five to ten speaking engagements per year, that adds $100,000 to $300,000 in gross annual income on top of her base salary. Corporate conferences, investment forums, and financial industry events are the natural venues for a CFA-credentialed television anchor, so this is a realistic and recurring income line.
There's no publicly documented evidence of major brand endorsement deals for Taylor Riggs, which is fairly typical for financial journalists who are bound by editorial and compliance standards at their networks. However, her credentials as both a CFA charterholder and a JD candidate make paid consulting or advisory work plausible, even if it's not publicly disclosed. Her active commentary on topics like tech, AI energy infrastructure, and market trends (she appeared discussing those subjects in a February 2026 Fox Business clip) suggests she is a sought-after voice, which generally supports speaking and consulting income even when endorsement deals aren't visible.
Investments and savings

Given her CFA designation, it would be unusual for Taylor Riggs not to be actively managing her own portfolio. The CFA credential is specifically an investment analysis qualification, and people who hold it tend to be more financially sophisticated about allocating personal savings into equities, bonds, and other assets. There is no public data on her specific holdings, but a professional with her income level and background over 13 years would reasonably have accumulated a meaningful investment portfolio as part of her net worth calculation.
Real estate and other assets
No specific property records for Taylor Riggs have surfaced in publicly available sources. She is originally from Merced, California, but her career has been centered in New York City (Bloomberg's main studios and Fox Business Network are both New York-based), which means real estate ownership in one of the world's most expensive housing markets is possible but unconfirmed. Real estate is typically the largest single asset class in a person's net worth, so whether she rents or owns in New York meaningfully shifts the estimate. New York City homeownership at even a modest level (a studio or one-bedroom) could add $500,000 to $1 million or more to her asset column, but could equally not be a factor if she rents. Without property records, this remains an open variable in the estimate.
Beyond real estate, the standard asset categories that factor into any net worth calculation include retirement accounts (401k, IRA), brokerage investments, cash savings, and any personal property of value. On the liability side, student loan debt is worth flagging: Taylor Riggs is currently pursuing a JD at New York Law School, and tuition at a private New York law school can run $60,000 to $70,000 per year. Whether she is paying out of pocket, taking loans, or has employer assistance is unknown, but it's a real potential liability that could reduce her net worth figure by tens of thousands of dollars. Net worth is always assets minus liabilities, a straightforward accounting principle that every estimate in this space should be applying.
How these estimates are actually built (and why they vary)
Most net-worth figures you'll find for Taylor Riggs come from celebrity net-worth estimation sites, not from audited financial documents. These sites typically work backward from publicly available information: known employment history, network salary benchmarks for the role type, publicly listed speaking fees, and general assumptions about savings rates and lifestyle. The result is always a range, and ranges vary because different sites use different salary benchmarks and make different assumptions about spending, debt, and investment returns.
To illustrate how wide that variance can be: one site pegs Taylor Riggs' net worth at exactly $3 million for 2025, another gives a range of $1 million to $5 million, a third says approximately $2 million for 2026, and a fourth also offers the $1 million to $5 million range. None of these sites show their full working, and none have access to private financial disclosures. Compare that to the methodology used by Forbes for its Forbes 400 list, where they value private businesses using revenue and profit estimates alongside comparable public-company multiples and apply a liquidity discount, with a specific snapshot date of September 1, 2025. That level of rigor simply does not exist for television journalists who have not made their finances public. The celebrity net-worth genre, as Wikipedia's own coverage of sites like CelebrityNetWorth notes, presents biography plus estimates without the kind of documentation that would make the number auditable.
The most defensible approach here is to treat the midpoint of the range ($2 million) as a reasonable working estimate, acknowledge the plausible floor of around $1 million (based on salary accumulation alone), and acknowledge that the ceiling could be higher if speaking income, consulting, and investments have been more productive than estimated. Calling it "approximately $1.5 million to $3 million" is more honest than any single-point number.
| Income/Wealth Source | Estimated Annual Contribution | Confidence Level |
|---|
| Fox Business anchor salary | $120,000 – $250,000 | Moderate (industry benchmark) |
| Public speaking fees | $100,000 – $300,000 | Moderate (listed fee range: $20K–$30K/engagement) |
| Investment portfolio returns | Unknown | Low (no public data) |
| Real estate equity | Unknown | Low (no property records found) |
| Endorsements / consulting | Unknown / likely modest | Low (no public documentation) |
| Law school liability (JD tuition) | -$60,000 to -$70,000/year (potential) | Low (enrollment confirmed, financing unknown) |
How to verify this yourself (and what to ignore)

If you want to pressure-test the estimate, start with the sources that have actual editorial standards. Fox Business' own bio page and Bloomberg's speaker listings confirm her employment history and role. IMDb's credits for "The Big Money Show" verify her on-air tenure from 2023 through at least March 2025. Gotham Artists' speaking fee listing ($20,000–$30,000) is a real agency rate, not a guess. For salary context, industry surveys from the Bureau of Labor Statistics or journalism trade publications regularly publish anchor and broadcast journalist salary ranges that you can use as a calibration point.
What you should be skeptical of: any site that presents a single precise number without explaining how they got there. If a page says "Taylor Riggs net worth: $3,250,000" with no methodology, that precision is false confidence. Those sites are typically scraping other estimation sites and adding a fake decimal of certainty. They also rarely update their liability estimates and almost never account for things like law school tuition debt or whether someone rents versus owns. The name confusion problem also matters here: some sites may be blending data from the actress Taylor Riggs on IMDb or other namesakes, which is exactly why the disambiguation step at the top of this article isn't just a formality.
It's also worth knowing that financial journalists like Taylor Riggs are generally not required to file public financial disclosures. That's a requirement for government officials and some corporate executives, not for television anchors or their employers. So the data gap here isn't a red flag, it's just the normal state of privacy for someone in her profession.
Putting it in context: how this compares to peers
Taylor Riggs' estimated net worth of $1.5 million to $3 million is consistent with where most financial television journalists land at the 10-to-15-year career mark. She's not in the tier of CNBC or Bloomberg anchors who have crossed into the $10 million-plus range through decades of high-profile hosting, book deals, and significant brand partnerships. But she's also clearly above the median for working journalists at large, and her CFA credential and JD pursuit signal someone building financial and professional capital across multiple disciplines simultaneously. Her career trajectory, from Bloomberg to Fox Business with a growing speaking profile, points toward a net worth that is more likely to increase than plateau over the next several years.
For context on how other public figures with the Riggs surname are tracked, our database also covers profiles like Chris Riggs and Michael Riggs, both of which illustrate how name disambiguation shapes net-worth research across our reference database. Similarly, profiles for Tyler Riggs and Trey Riggs show that even within a single surname, career industry is the single most important disambiguating factor when researching wealth estimates.
Your next steps for tracking this estimate
- Bookmark the Fox Business bio page for Taylor Riggs. It updates with her current role and any major career changes, which is the fastest signal that her income structure has shifted.
- Check speaking bureau listings (Gotham Artists, Speakers Associates) periodically. If her fee range jumps from $20K–$30K to $50K+, that signals increased market demand and a likely upward revision to net worth estimates.
- Search property records in New York County (Manhattan) and surrounding boroughs if you want to attempt a more precise asset calculation. New York City ACRIS (the Automated City Register Information System) is a free public database for property transactions.
- Use industry salary surveys as a calibration tool. The Radio Television Digital News Association (RTDNA) publishes annual salary data for television journalists by market size and role, which helps sanity-check the anchor salary assumptions in any net-worth estimate.
- Treat any single-number net-worth claim without methodology as a floor for skepticism, not a fact. The honest range of $1.5 million to $3 million acknowledges what we know and what we don't.
It's also worth checking whether any namesake confusion is affecting the estimate you're reading. Our database includes profiles for Tristan Riggs and Seth Riggs, both of whom demonstrate how easily distinct individuals get conflated when a surname is common. If a net-worth site is pulling data from a wrong "Taylor Riggs," a quick cross-check against her confirmed LinkedIn or Fox Business bio solves the problem in seconds. And for a broader look at how financial journalists and media professionals compare in wealth terms to other professional categories, our profile of Seth Rausch offers a useful parallel career-earnings case study.